Election 2006

Homepage || GNI Publications || News || History of Guyana || Herdmanston Accord

Sources: Guyana Elections Commission - Chronicle - Stabroek News. - Guyana Elections 2001

Links: PPP/Civic HomePage - PPP/Civic Election Website - PNC Reform - GAP - ROAR Website

See chart of election results from 1992,1997,2001 and 2006.

Results for 2006 Election

Updated September 3rd. 2006

A unique result

The PPP/C has done better in terms of seats than even it expected, if its "Grand Victory Rally" held at Stewartville not after, but before the election is anything to go on. Such arrogance had more than the whiff of insecurity about it, otherwise why would any party have found it necessary to celebrate a win more than thirty-six hours before the polls even opened? When the PPP/C's campaign speakers in Bartica begged the crowd for votes to give them an overall majority, they probably came closer to revealing their true fears. Yet despite the fact that the party to its presumed surprise has ended up with more seats than it obtained in 2001, in a real sense it did not perform better than last time; it performed considerably worse. Firstly the turnout of 69 per cent may be the lowest for an open election in this country ever, and secondly, in a sense the governing party won by default: that is to say it won because the PNCR-1G lost in style.

To take Region 4 as an example, in 2001 the PPP/C had 74,501 votes, and this time it received 61,896. The result simply looks good because the PNCR's figure of 95,894 in 2001 was slashed to 67,726 this time around. And voter turnout was especially poor here: with 217,168 on the electoral roll for this district, only 148,373 bothered to go and vote (and almost 2,000 of those ballots were spoilt). Added to this, of course, the AFC picked up 13,566 votes in this region. But even in its heartland of Region 6, the PPP/C cannot be thrilled with the result. With 80,434 voters on the list, 57,876 went to cast their ballots; this was 10,000 less than in 2001 with a smaller number of registered voters. The party received 41,713 votes this time around as against 47,701 in 2001. As for Region 10 where its hopes were riding so high, it received around 700 fewer votes than last time. The PNCR votes on the other hand, were slashed by almost half, with 3,016 votes going to the AFC. The rest, it seems, weren't given to anyone, since more than 10,000 voters stayed home and did not bother to show up at the polls at all. So much for cross-over voting in a traditional PNC stronghold.

Now it may be, as was said in Thursday's editorial in this newspaper, that some of those on the register had migrated. Until house to house registration is undertaken it will be impossible to know how many absent voters are accounted for in this way. However, this kind of turnout (including in Amerindian areas) cannot be explained entirely by migration; the electorate is telling the two big parties something, although they have done it in a very understated fashion, and produced a paradoxical result to boot. Eight per cent of the electors went out and put their X next to the AFC, but for the rest, they did not desert their traditional parties, they just did not vote for them - or for anyone else. In such circumstances a non-vote is a statement of a kind.

So what is it the electorate is saying? At the very least the voters have said that they are dissatisfied with our politicians and their performance, and are weary of the way politics is played in Guyana. Where the government is concerned, its supporters' pre-eminent message no doubt related to crime, and the failure of the government to address this problem. In a general sense, however, the electors probably also may have been indicating they did not want more of the same: the same old obsession to control everything, the same old refusal to listen to others, the same old loyalty test for appointments, the same old failure to recognize talent, the same old belief that they have all the answers when given some of their spectacular failures clearly they don't, the same old conspiracy theories, the same old opaqueness when asked to account for anything, the same old denials when things are obviously wrong, the same old lack of inclusiveness, the same old faces in cabinet, the same old rhetoric. The question is, is the PPP/C even capable of recognizing its shortcomings and responding to the nation's need to breathe again?

The message the voters sent to the PNCR was altogether more direct. Allowing for the fact that the party sent confused signals to its supporters prior to the election because of its ambivalence about the electoral list, as well as the fact that a public holiday militated against city voters since there was no public transportation on the streets, nevertheless, there was something else at work. The unprecedented low turnout in the party's heartland is nothing short of a disaster for the main opposition. Since the PNCR is not in government, this has to be a statement about its leadership. The party has done no work among its supporters for a long time, and while they could get away with that under the late Mr Hoyte, who inspired tremendous personal loyalty among the traditional constituency which turned out to vote for him no matter what, the same is not true now that he has gone.

While the PNCR has neglected its power base for a long time, the need at least to bestir itself with an election in the offing, does not appear to have crossed its mind. It did not even bother to ensure its supporters were registered, for example, and it did not make arrangements to see that they went to the polling stations. If you ignore your power base for long enough, it will punish you at the polls, and this is exactly what happened.

In addition, clearly a significant number of PNCR supporters chose to vote for Mr Trotman. The signals are that these are different times: supporters want a new vision and a new face at the top which is not associated with the old discredited politics. They want a party which reorganizes itself to work among them on an ongoing basis and represent their concerns, and a party which can confront the PPP/C at another level entirely - intellectually and in Parliament.

And now Mr Corbin in circumstances which clearly do not warrant it given the abysmal showing of his party at the polls is talking of shared governance. Has he paid no attention to the results at all? The voters made a statement about his performance, among other things, so why does he believe they want him now to share power with the PPP/C? While his intentions are no doubt good, he is nevertheless conveying an altogether different impression of where his true interests lie. As was said in our Thursday editorial, the PNCR had an opportunity for the first time since 1992 to prevent the PPP/C from obtaining an overall majority, and it miffed it. The rank and file cannot possibly want Mr Corbin in government with the PPP/C at this stage; they are waiting to see if the PNCR is capable of introspection and can put its house in order. If it can't do this, it is in danger of wiping itself off the political map at some point in the future.

And as for the AFC which got the best showing of any third party since the 1960s, it has an opportunity to make a difference in Parliament. This is its opening to show those whom it represents that it is prepared to build up expertise on the various issues which come before the House, and confront the governing party when it is pursuing an obviously wrong path. It can indicate to the nation it is prepared to do serious work within the parliamentary framework, appearing at committee meetings and holding the government to account.

It already has among its leaders Mrs Sheila Holder, who acquired a reputation in the last Parliament for hard work; it now has to institutionalise that, and set a standard for monitoring government actions and asking probing questions which could galvanise the rest of the opposition as well. If it makes a good public showing, it will build confidence among the electorate that it deserves people's votes.

This election has produced a result which is unique in the history of this country. The two major parties had better take note. Stabroek Editorial September 3rd. 2006


President Jagdeo to be sworn in today

PRESIDENT-ELECT, incumbent Mr Bharrat Jagdeo will be sworn in to office today, following his People’s Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/C) victory at the August 28 polls, the Government Information Agency (GINA) confirmed yesterday.

The swearing-in takes place at State House in Georgetown and preparations for it are ongoing, with work being done on the building and lawns while tents are erected to accommodate the invited guests.

GINA said Howard Construction Company is doing minor repairs on the northern end of the edifice.

It was the fourth PPP/C victory at the polls since Guyana gained independence in 1966, when the last was declared on August 31.

Today’s programme will see President Jagdeo being administered the Oath of Office by Acting Chancellor of the Judiciary, Chief Justice Carl Singh.

GINA said the official function will feature, as well, an announcement by Chairman of the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM), Dr Steve Surujbally and the highlight would be an address to the nation by the Head of State, to be followed by a Guyana Defence Force (GDF) 21-Gun Salute.

The Guyana Police Force Band will also provide musical entertainment at the reception which follows, GINA said.


VICTORY HUG: President Bharrat Jagdeo and First Lady Varshnie Jagdeo at Freedom House last night after the PPP/C won Monday's Elections. (Cullen Bess-Neslon photo)


PPP/C sweeps to victory

SECURING a whopping 54.6 per cent of votes cast at Monday’s general and regional elections, the People’s Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/C) last night swept to a convincing win of the 2006 polls, giving incumbent President Bharrat Jagdeo, 42, another five-year term to carry out his party’s US$500B development plan.

Saying he was “very, very satisfied” with the conduct of the polls, and confident that he carried out a “credible election,” Chief Election Officer (CEO) Mr. Gocool Boodoo declared the results at Le Meridien Pegasus Hotel in Georgetown in the presence of the chairman and commissioners of the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM).


FINAL RESULT: The panel for the official declaration of the 2006 elections results yesterday. From left are Commissioners Mr. Mahmood Shaw, Dr. Keshav Mangal and Mr. Lloyd Joseph, GECOM Chairman Dr. Steve Surujbally, commissioners Mr. Moen McDoom and Mr. Robert Williams, and Chief Elections Officer Mr. Gocool Boodoo.

The PPP/C, chalking up 183,887 votes, has effectively secured the Parliamentary majority with 36 seats in the National Assembly, two more than the last time, putting the People’s National Congress Reform–One Guyana (PNCR–1G) as the main parliamentary opposition with 22 seats.

Three other parties will also sit in Parliament. Newcomers Alliance for Change (AFC) will occupy six seats, the alliance of the Guyana Action Party and Rise Organise and Rebuild (GAP – ROAR) one seat, and The United Force (TUF) one seat.

Mr. Robert Corbin, the 58-year-old attorney who secured the leadership of the PNCR in early 2003 following the death of Hugh Desmond Hoyte, sunk the party to three Parliamentary seats fewer than it gained in the 2001 polls.

Only 69 per cent of the 492,369 eligible voters went to the polls on Monday, a notable difference from the 2001 polls when 89 per cent of the 440,185 eligible electors cast ballots.

Chief Elections Officer Mr. Gocool Boodoo declares the official results of the 2006 general and regional elections at Le Meridien Pegasus last evening.

For the first time ever, the PPP/C secured Parliamentary seats for all 10 geographic constituencies, notably moving into Region 10, a traditional stronghold of the PNCR. In fact, the PPP/C won majority votes in eight of the 10 geographic constituencies.

The PPP/C secured 15 of the 25 geographic constituency seats, while the PNCR collected nine. The AFC secured the remaining seat, thanks to votes secured in Region Four.

From the national top up list, the PPP/C raked in 21 seats, eight more than the PNCR-1G. The AFC marked up four seats, while GAP-ROAR and TUF secured one each.

The PPP/C swept the polls with compelling victories in Regions Two, Three, and Six. It also secured the most votes in Regions One, Five, Seven, Eight and Nine.

The PNCR continued its main hold on Region Four, and took the lead in Region 10, though it had to share the two geographic seats for this region with the PPP/C.

Mr. Boodhoo debunked suggestions that his declaration of the finals results was late, saying the law gives him 15 days within which to announce the results, and he did it in three days.

He said the elections were credible, declaring “there could be no question about that.” The CEO said he was accustomed to litigation and was prepared to deal with any such challenge to the elections and the results he announced.

Opposition commissioner of GECOM, Mr. Robert Williams said if he did not endorse the elections and the results, he would not have been present at the declaration of the results.

Also present, were the other opposition commissioner Mr. Floyd Joseph, and the PPP/C commissioners Dr. Keshav `Bud’ Mangal, Mr. Moen McDoom, and Mr. Mahmood Shaw.

GECOM Chairman Dr. Steve Surujbally said the nation owed gratitude to an “indefatigable” Boodoo and he also praised Deputy CEO Mr. Calvin Benn, and Assistant CEO, Mr. Keith Lowenfield.

He also thanked the local and foreign observers, the Joint International Technical Assessors, media consultant Tim Neale, and congratulated the parties for their “maturity” and the media for its “copious” work.

The other parties which contested the elections but did not win any Parliamentary seats were the Justice For All Party, Guyana National Congress, Liberal Democrats, National Democratic Party and the People’s Republican Party.


Jagdeo back by landslide

The PPP/C was last night declared the official winner of the general elections with 54.6% of the national votes to secure 36 seats in the 65-member parliament.

Led by incumbent President Bharrat Jagdeo who will return for a second term, the party received 183,887 of the 336,375 valid votes counted for the elections, to gain two seats more than its showing at 2001 polls despite getting 26,000 fewer votes. The main opposition PNCR-1G coalition accounted for 34% of the count, receiving 114,608 votes for 22 seats, for a loss of five seats. The party got 50,000 less votes than at the last elections. Meanwhile, the AFC, which was formed less than a year ago by ex-members of the two major parties, amassed 28,366 votes or an 8.4% share to manage five seats; GAP-ROAR collected 4,249 votes and the TUF 2,694 to secure the remaining two. JFAP, which had established an early lead over the TUF, received 2,571 votes, which were not enough for a seat at the end of the count. The regional results were almost identical.

Overall, there was a voter turnout of 69% from the 492,369 voters on the official list - significantly lower than the 89% recorded five year ago. However, the inclusion of post-2001 migrants on the list is one factor that could potentially skew the turnout since it inflates the list although there are no estimates of these figures are available.

Chief Election Officer Gocool Boodoo declared the results shortly after 8 pm last night in between frequent sips of water and amidst an almost ceaseless cacophony of ringing cellular phones at the GECOM media centre at Le Meridien Pegasus Hotel. He said afterward that he was "very satisfied" that a credible election had been delivered to the people. "There is no question about it," he remarked, while adding that the declaration of the results have never been done so quickly.

The results were announced with GECOM Chairman Dr Steve Surujbally on hand, along with the three PPP/C-nominated members, Dr Keshav Mangal, Mohamood Shaw, and Moen McDoom as well as the opposition-nominees, Lloyd Joseph and Robert Williams. The other opposition-nominated member, Haslyn Parris, resigned at the end of July in light of his concerns over the preparations for the elections. Joseph and Williams had expressed their own concerns in the run up to the polls, but endorsed last night's results. "If they weren't endorsed I would not be here," Williams said, while Joseph was more guarded, explaining that the questions about the issues he was concerned about are still to be legally determined. "The endorsement does not mean that those questions have been resolved, but I have a responsibility to discharge and I had to follow procedures to the end - to the extent that the law was followed," he said.

Boodoo, responding to a question about possible legal challenges to the results, noted that he had become "very accustomed" to them and would deal with any eventuality.

According to the results given by Boodoo, the PPP/C received 21 national top up seats and 15 geographical constituency seats to claim an overall parliamentary majority; the PNCR-1G received 13 national top up seats and nine geographical constituency seats for its 22 seats; the AFC received four national top up seats and one geographical constituency seat for its five overall. GAP-ROAR and the TUF each received one seat at the national top up level. The PPP/C's geographical constituency seats comprised three in Region 4, two each in Regions 2, 3 and 6, and one each in Regions 1, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 10; the PNCR-1G's nine seats comprise three in Region 4; and one each in Regions 1, 3,5,6,7,and 10. The AFC got one seat in Region 4.

While the PNCR topped the vote count in Region 4 with 68,112 votes, its traditional majority was considerably eroded as the PPP/C was not far behind with 62,386 votes, a difference of 5,726. At the last elections the differential was more than 21,000 votes. Behind the two parties, the AFC collected 13,876 votes, which could have accounted for the erosion of the PNCR's support.

Boodoo announced the results after receiving statements of declaration of results from the Returning Officers of the 10 polling districts where the votes for each party list were recorded. The declaration came a day after the date by which the results were originally promised and it remains to be seen whether the new parliament would be established by the September 2 constitutional deadline. According to Article 69(1) of the Constitution, the first sitting of the Parliament is due to be held four months after its dissolution - which is Saturday.

Boodoo could not answer the question last night and said it was legal matter.

By law, the President has to be sworn in, while representatives of parties' lists have to extract the names of the candidates for election to parliament. The CEO is required to submit the names of the candidates to the Clerk of the Parliament, who will then finalise the arrangements for the meeting. GECOM is responsible for providing the members with a certification of the election.

There is also supposed to be a notification by way of a special issue of the Official Gazette, to inform the number of votes for each list of candidates; the number of rejected ballots; the number of seats allocated to each list of candidates; and the names of the persons who as a result of the election have become members of the parliament. Afterward, the President shall appoint the date for the first session of the new Parliament by proclamation.

Coinciding with these activities, the Chief Election Officer is to inform the Clerks of the Regional Democratic Councils and Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Regional Development of the extraction of the names for the persons who have been elected to be members of the councils. The Clerks will afterward organise the council meetings to elect the chairs and vice-chairs. Stabroek News September 1st. 2006


PNCR-1G accepts GECOM results

The PNCR-1G, having completed its evaluation of the statements of poll submitted by its polling agents, has stated that its results closely approximate those announced so far by the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM).

In a statement issued last night, the PNCR-1G said that while it was disappointed with the voter turnout the platform nevertheless congratulated the people of Guyana, "who by their exemplary conduct on Elections Day, defied the prophets of doom."

The statement said that the PNCR-1G will shortly publish its evaluation of the electoral process and the conduct of the polls on Election Day. Among the areas that would be addressed are, the lack of a level playing field for political parties including the misuse of the state media, even on polling day, to promote the interest of the governing party; the failure to verify the voters' list and its implications for the elections; undue difficulties faced by electors for both registration and voting; and inefficiencies in the functioning of GECOM.

Now that the elections were over the PNCR-1G assured its supporters that the results were not what the platform had hoped for, however, it would resolutely promote and defend their interests.

In addition, the PNCR said that it would be pursuing a number of initiatives to enhance economic well-being as it seeks to move Guyana forward with the One Guyana platform. Stabroek News September 1st. 2006


PPP/C on way to majority -final results delayed

The PPP/C was last night emerging as the unofficial winner of Monday's general elections with enough votes to secure a parliamentary majority based on the results from 92% of polling stations.

The results available for 1852 of the 1999 polling stations showed that the incumbent received 174,155 of the 313,964 valid votes that were counted by the 8 pm update after it took eight of the ten electoral districts to amass an unassailable lead in the polls. The main opposition PNCR-1G coalition which accumulated 105,288 of the votes seemed on its way to recording its worst result in democratic elections, although it maintained a slim majority in Districts 4 and 10, which have been traditional strongholds. The AFC has thus far posted the highest votes for a third party since the United Force in 1964, receiving 26,094 of the votes. GAP-ROAR received 3,556, JFAP 2,426, and the TUF 2,345.

Though still to be worked out, the 65-seat parliament would see the PPP/C retaining its 34 seats, the PNCR(-1G) falling from 27 to 23 and the AFC clinching six seats. Two other seats were still up for grabs and one could possibly go to the GAP-ROAR alliance based on its Region 9 showing and the other to CN Sharma's Justice For All Party. The United Force, a parliamentary participant for many years was unlikely to retain its seat.

Chief Election Officer Gocool Boodoo was unable to declare the official results as scheduled last night without the completed count of statements of poll for all the stations although updated figures were released throughout the night.

The figure for total votes cast by the time of the update was 318, 631, with 313,964 counted as valid after the subtraction of 4,667 rejected ballots. The figure of cast ballots represented a 65% turnout of the 492,369 voters in the official list, although the figure was expected to be adjusted with the declaration of the outstanding results. The numbers for regional elections did not differ greatly, with 316,318 ballots cast of which 310,891 were counted as valid after the subtraction of 5,427 rejected ballots. Like at the national polls, the PPP/C claimed the majority with 170,216 votes, while the PNCR-1G got 105,383, and the AFC 25,240. GAP-ROAR received 3,890, JFAP 3,251, TUF 2,482, GNC 146, LD 136, and PRP 128.

The one sobering fact from the results thus far for the ruling party is that it is securing its majority with around 27,000 less votes than it did in 2001 - and this despite a high-energy campaign that blanketed the country over the last few weeks. Analysts attributed this to voter apathy and the battering the ruling party has taken over the crime situation. The opposition PNCR was likely to get around 44,000 less votes than it got in 2001 and analysts suggested that this was as a result of the twin-track campaign it ran - pledging no elections without verification. In the end it contested the elections without verification.

Boodoo said he would not risk giving partial results and would wait for the outstanding figures, though he mentioned that he had started to calculate the allocation of seats.

Boodoo explained that by virtue of section 84:01 of the Representation of the People Act, each Returning Officer would have to make a public declaration at their district office before he could advise the commission. "This has been a very controversial issue in the past," he pointed out, "We are not going to make those kinds of mistakes again."

At that point, Boodoo confirmed that statements of poll were available for all stations save for two that had to be verified. He explained that there were some arithmetical errors that would legally have to be corrected by the Returning Officers, which held up some of the declarations. "The law makes it quite clear the Returning Officers have to do it and that is one of the sticky areas we have on our hands right now," he said.

GECOM had given assurances that the final result would be out much quicker than in the previous three elections but with yesterday's deferral it would not be much of a change from 2001. GECOM had contracted an expert to advise on how to improve the speed of the final declaration and it is unclear whether any such measures were finally implemented.

Despite a much-vaunted campaign in Region 10, the PPP/C was likely to end with around 2,600 votes - significantly less than the 3,985 it picked up in 2001 and the 3,000 it claimed as the size of one of its major pre-election launch rallies in Linden. The ruling party was also likely to experience a decline of around 6,000 votes in its major stronghold of Region Six.

Based on the 92% results last night, the AFC had its strongest showing in Region Four where it notched up 12,900 votes and it also picked up 2,510 votes in Region 10 - just under half of the PNCR-1G's tally. The AFC also secured 2,733 votes in Region Three and 2,834 votes in Region Six.

Boodoo also assured the security of ballot boxes and noted that there were no reports of breaches. He said the parties had up to midday Tuesday to ask for a recount and since then the boxes have been secured and only a court of law could require them to be opened. Stabroek News August 31st. 2006


Corbin calls for national unity government -- commits to environment of peace

COMMITTING itself to an environment of peace and calling for inclusive governance, the People’s National Congress-One Guyana (PNCR-1G) last evening appeared to have conceded defeat with latest results pointing to a majority win for the People’s Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/C).

“We must now, not tomorrow, or next month, agree to devise a new model of governance where all stakeholders can feel confident that they will be included in the process and enjoy the fruit of development,” PNCR leader, Mr. Robert Corbin said in a TV address.

The last official announcement of the results by Chief Elections Officer, Mr. Gocool Boodoo, at 20:00 h, showed the PNCR-1G behind the PPP/C by more than 60,000 votes, with just 147 of 1,999 Statements of Poll to be verified.

Corbin said his party was monitoring the results of GECOM, but he did not venture to dispute them.

He told his supporters the party would not abandon them and will “prevent the PPP/C from continuing its policy of the arbitrary use of power and the resources of the state to victimize, marginalize and humiliate those persons who have supported the PNCR-1G and other opposition parties.”

“My party will pursue this course of action as part of its campaign to deepen the democratic process and to establish good governance, fair play and justice,” he said.

Corbin declared that his party is “firmly committed to an environment of peace” and “has and can have no interest in creating or encouraging conditions of instability.”

The continuing calm of these polls is a stark difference from the violence of the previous three elections for which the PNCR was blamed as these resulted from its anti-government street protests.

According to Corbin, the PNCR-1G platform carried out a vigorous campaign highlighting programmes and proposals for making Guyana into a modern 21st century state under a model of shared governance or government of national unity.

He said his party has been busy recording the results declared at the individual polling stations and monitoring the announcements by GECOM to ensure that they were consistent with the information provided by its party agents.

“From the results before us it is clear that, in large measure, the ethnic voting patterns have remained deep-seated,” Corbin said. His party is mainly supported by Afro-Guyanese, while the PPP/C is mainly supported by Indo-Guyanese.

He said despite the fact that the PNCR-1G conducted a campaign based on the issues and eschewed any appeal to race “the results have indicated that ethnic voting patterns continue to manifest themselves.”

Corbin argued that the election results have demonstrated yet again that the current system of governance in Guyana is “woefully inadequate as a vehicle for forging national unity and continues to be the basis of the existing political instability that suffocates our nation.”

“It must, therefore, be obvious to all that a government of national unity, based on the principle of shared governance, is essential to enable the nation to overcome its present difficulties and get on with the business of real economic development,” he stated.

He claimed there is a hardened perception among a substantial section of the Afro-Guyanese community that they could not survive five more years of the PPP/C rule.

“On behalf of the PNCR-1G we issue a serious call to the entire political leadership of Guyana to save our country from the imminent peril it faces. There can be no more noble a cause for us to serve at this time. Our viability as a nation must be secured and we stand ready tonight to commence and complete the process expeditiously,” Corbin declared.

He added that in the party’s recent manifesto, the PNCR-1G restated and re-emphasised this as essential for the rapid development of Guyana.

Corbin said his party campaigned on a platform which promised to empower the youth of the country, and assured those who worked hard during their campaign that the party will continue its efforts to realize this promise.

“In this regard, the PNCR, in collaboration with others, will work with the youth of this country to access the required resources so as to enable them to realise their potential, as envisaged in the party’s Youth Empowerment Scheme (YES),” he stated.


Peace holds as results unfold

THE calm that has surprisingly dominated the 2006 elections held yesterday as the nation awaited the final official results of Monday’s general and regional voting, with normalcy slowly returning to Georgetown and other parts of the coast.

As the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM) appealed for patience while the official vote count was still under way 24 hours after the polls closed, the incumbent People’s Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/C) was maintaining earlier forecasts of a comfortable victory, with the main opposition People’s National Congress Reform-One Guyana (PNCR-1G) also projecting victory in a “dead heat” with its traditional main rival.

GECOM also held back from giving an official voter turnout percentage until more information was received as international observers joined in commending the electorate, political parties, the Police and Army and others for ensuring peace since Polling Day.

Cautious store owners and other business places, including banks and service stations, yesterday kept shutters on their store fronts and a wary eye out for street protesters who turned violent during post-polling disturbances in the 1992, 1997 and 2001 elections.

But there was no sign of trouble and as night fell, an eerie kind of hush descended on streets around Georgetown and along the East Coast Demerara and other parts of the coast, with very little traffic and few people around.

Night brought almost a repeat of the situation that prevailed Monday in many parts of the coast.

The Army and Police maintained patrols in the sensitive capital, and in an effective demonstration of their readiness to deal with any sign of trouble, units were quickly on the scene at a fire which broke out in a house on Lamaha Street yesterday morning.

They kept a close watch as fire fighters went into action to try to contain the flames which erupted in the house while an old lady was trying to make coffee.

Some stores opened for business on the usually busy Regent Street after the national holiday on Elections Day Monday and there was a sprinkling of shoppers around the city’s commercial sector.

But sellers and shoppers were few in the normally busy city markets, with many stalls tightly closed and not much goods displayed for sale.

There was an air of cautious optimism as the city, its citizens and visitors struggled to fight off the lingering but ever present fear of trouble from the post-elections violence of 1992, 1997 and 2001.

Mini-buses were back again on their usual city and out of town routes, there were more taxis on the roads but many people appeared to be holding their breath until the final official elections results are out – maybe by tonight or early tomorrow.

Some people appeared worried at the slow release of the results but GECOM Chairman, Dr. Steve Surujbally, earning praise from observers and others for the smooth polls conduct, yesterday appealed for patience.

He said the results are going through a stringent process of verification and rechecking before being released in an effort to ensure that there are “absolutely no errors”, and that they can withstand the “harshest of scrutiny”.

GECOM, he declared at a press conference, “will not sacrifice accuracy on the twin altars of alacrity and expediency”.

While President Bharrat Jagdeo lauded GECOM for the “wonderful conduct” of Monday’s general and regional elections, PNCR Leader, Mr. Robert Corbin, was not that impressed.

“I wish to congratulate GECOM and the staff of GECOM for the wonderful conduct of the elections yesterday (Monday)...I think things went smoothly in spite of minor glitches which are associated with elections everywhere in the world and I am very pleased that everyone recognized that and acknowledged it, including the international community”, President Jagdeo told reporters yesterday

The President also commended the security forces – the Police Force and the Army - for a job well done.

But Corbin, while acknowledging that the general environment was mainly peaceful and devoid of significant tension, and commending the Guyanese people in all regions for conducting themselves in an orderly and responsible manner, charged that the elections process did not go smoothly as GECOM had promised.

He alleged that there was collusion between GECOM officials and PPP/C party activists, and at other stations, there was single-handed skulduggery performed by “a few” Presiding Officers.


PPP/C leads

Partial results for the elections show the incumbent PPP/C in the lead with more than 55% of the counted votes.

After the first full day of counting, the PPP/C received 90,601 of the 164,564 valid votes that were counted by 11 pm last night from partial results from the electoral districts 1,2,3,4,6 and 7; the main opposition PNCR-1G coalition received 56,618 votes (34%); the AFC 13,916 (8.5%); JFAP 1,603; GAP-ROAR 846; and TUF 620.

The figures were generated from 922 completed statements of poll for the 1999 polling stations that were set up in the country's ten electoral districts, but the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM) could not say what percentage of the overall turnout they represented or which specific areas they belonged to.

Although there were 493,369 eligible voters on the list there was a low turnout at the polls and none of the officials would speculate about the reasons for this occurrence. In the 2001 election 403,734 votes were cast and the PPP/C captured 210,013.

It was still a close race in District 4 (Demerara/ Mahaica), where the PPP/C accumulated 44,926 of the 95,709 valid votes that were counted from 512 of the region's 763 polling stations. The PNCR-1G was not far behind in its stronghold with 40,560 votes, while the AFC took 8,780. Among the smaller parties, the JFAP received 1019 votes; the GAP-ROAR received 224; and the TUF 200. Read full article


PPP/C confident of victory, despite `mixed’ voter turnout

THE People’s Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/C) is confident of winning yesterday’s elections, despite low voter turnout in some areas in which it traditionally had strong support.

After close of polls last evening, party General Secretary, Mr. Donald Ramotar described the voter turnout as “mixed”, saying while it was high in some of its stronghold areas there was a low turnout in others.

However, he said the party, which has held the seat of government for 14 years, was not “worried” but “very confident” of victory again.

His comments came at a press conference at his party headquarters, Freedom House, some four hours after polls closed.

During the day, the party’s presidential candidate, Mr. Bharrat Jagdeo, seeking re-election, visited several East Coast Demerara villages, where he urged residents to vote and to help others to do likewise.

The Government Information Agency (GINA) said the President’s visit was prompted by reports from polling agents that “there was a lull in the voting process.”

Lusignan, Martyrsville and Mon Repos were some of the villages the President visited, GINA stated,

During the visit, the agency said, it was observed that most persons had already voted and the President urged them to assist others to participate in the process.

“You can go to the areas and see if persons are voting. Despite the large turnout early, everybody did not come out to vote. We have to get every person out. You can go into the communities and assist your neighbour to come out and vote,” the President was quoted as saying to residents.

Some nine hours into polling, the PPP General Secretary said his party was pleased with the conduct of the polls, despite the fact that some supporters, like at Crane, West Coast Demerara and Lusignan, East Coast Demerara, could not find their names on the list.

However, he said such reports were minimal and his party was “extremely happy” with the state of calmness on elections day, noting that there were no “major incidents” to report.

Ramotar indicated that while voter turnout was high in the early morning when polling places opened at 06:00 h, it eased around noon.

The PPP General Secretary, at a press briefing at Freedom House, said there seems to have been a misunderstanding in some elections officials at polling places not allowing party agents to observe the process. He said this happened to its agents in Region Eight (Potaro/Siparuni).

The Alliance For Change and the Justice For All Party complained about this early in the day, but Guyana Elections Commission Chairman Dr. Steve Surujbally explained that no directive was issued to prevent party agents without accreditation letters from entering polling places.

REGION THREE

Early morning voting saw almost empty polling stations in Region Three (West Demerara/Essequibo Islands) just after noon.

While patrols of the Police and the Army were not pronounced, all the polling stations were guarded by either Police or Rural Constables. They reported that activity at their polling places was peaceful, noting that there was heavy voting early in the morning.

Visits were made to polling places at Parika, Vergenoegen and Tuschen, all on the East Bank of Essequibo, and to Met-en-Meerzorg, Den Amstel and Vreed-en-hoop on the West Coast Demerara. On the West Bank Demerara, the situation was the same from La Grange to Wales.

At Met-en-Meerzorg, one woman said she could not find her name at the three polling places she was directed to. After calling the GECOM hotlines without success, she decided to give up.

No incidents were reported at any of the polling places and at noon, officials in most were sitting, awaiting any voter who would turn up.

In the villages, residents completed voting and went back to their homes peacefully and many said they were catching up with work at home.

Some 67,000 were listed as eligible electors for Region Three. Guyana Chronicle August 29th. 2006


Trouble-free voting

Voters cast their ballots across the country yesterday at what were peaceful elections, although initial results point to a lower than expected turnout and while the PPP/C and the PNCR-1G were showing solid results in their strongholds the Alliance For Change also had good returns in some areas.

Up to 1.30 this morning, the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM) was unable to give any preliminary results on the counting of ballots from 1,999 polling stations that were set up across the country. This failure occurred despite assurances that GECOM would begin releasing results quickly. But initial reports from the field pointed to a low turnout among the 493,369 eligible voters on the official voters' list. By mid-afternoon, GECOM had reported a 55% turnout, or around 270,000 voters but no estimates were given afterwards. Stabroek News reporters gathered figures from several polling stations and abridged versions of these can be found on page 10.

At the 2001 elections, there were 396,516 votes counted from a list of 440,185.

Chief Election officer Gocool Boodoo refused to make any figures available last night without verifying them with an original statement of poll. "I don't want to speculate," he said. "We have to be extremely careful about what we relay to the media." He said counting of the ballots would be done by an IT team and manually and he reported that it was being done at a satisfactory rate although some checking was to be done. The counting of ballots in District 3 was completed and the results were to have been available by midnight. Boodoo said a full account would be given at an update at 6 am this morning. More updates are expected throughout the day, while the commission hopes to declare final results by tomorrow night at the earliest.

The election process was peaceful throughout the country and the police and the army maintained constant mobile patrols on the streets. There was an incident of voters being verbally threatened at the Cove and John polling station but police responded immediately, resulting in the disbanding of the threatening group and the resumption of voting. Later, shortly before the close of polls the commission was also informed that supporters of a party who had already voted were being bussed to polling stations in certain areas. The police were again called in to intervene. The party was not identified.

Voting was heavy from the 6 am opening of polls, even with intermittent showers during the morning. GECOM Chairman Dr Steve Surujbally told reporters that all the stations opened punctually and electors stood in line, waited patiently for their turn and behaved in a mature and orderly fashion. He estimated that the rain might have influenced the turnout by the mid-morning and the early afternoon. Added to that, there were problems at some locations but he said tranquil and orderly voting continued. "I am convinced we carried out our mandate pretty well," he later told a news conference after the close of polls. "We have listened and observed problems; we have tried to solve them. That is our role. That is our responsibility," he added.

GECOM teams were dispatched around the city to assist presiding officers at polling stations where problems were encountered by the electors. However, the commission reported that these were not widespread overall. "I know it's not large," Surujbally said, "…I know that it's not huge." There were electors who did not know where they were designated to vote; there were instances where electors turned up at the wrong stations; and there were also some who could not find their names on the list at all.

In many cases, the electors had not checked to ensure that their names were on the voters' list before they turned up at the polling stations (although there were some who had checked in advance but discovered upon turning up that they had been relocated to other stations in the area).

Dr Surujbally admitted that one of the reasons for this development had been the use of school complexes where there were multiple stations, causing congestion while persons tried to find their names on the list. "We might have to rethink it," he said, "It's getting us into some trouble."

Others had registered in different areas but did not effect transfers.

This was the situation in Sophia, where there were numerous complaints by electors who could not find their names on the lists at stations. Dr Surujbally noted that the area had originated as a squatting area and was regularised recently as a part of the capital city and he explained that many of the residents came from rural areas and took up residence without effecting transfers. "That means that they are still on the [voters' list] in the district or area from which they originated and where they are registered," he explained.

Opposition-nominated member of the commission Robert Williams told the news conference that he had overseen the voting in South Georgetown, where there were nearly 100 stations. "I dare anyone to say that there is a problem there at any polling place that has not been solved or that has been of any consequences," Williams said. He singled out the Albouystown area, noting that while there had been problems in the past, there was "absolutely no problem" this time around. He said Ruimveldt had a few hitches in the morning, because the East Ruimveldt School housed about 14 polling stations and there was congestion at the start of the day. However, he did sound the first warning that the turnout fell short of expectations. "The turnout has not been which we all anticipated in all the polling places I visited and that obviously may have a significant impact on the results of the elections," he said. The public holiday and the absence of public transportation were among the reasons given for the poor turnout.

There was a slight gaffe at the start of polling when the AFC and the JFAP reported that their party agents were being denied entry into polling places because officials were asking them for letters of accreditation. Similar problems were encountered by some domestic observers. However, GECOM, upon receipt of the reports, quickly sought to address the situation and instructed its returning officers to ensure that presiding officers at the polling stations allow entry to all political party agents and observers with identification cards.

According to the Government Information Agency, President Bharrat Jagdeo took note of the initial glitches, including the congestion at schools, but he said they were to be expected in such a large scale exercise. "They are trying to sort these things out now," he was quoted as saying. PNCR-1G Presidential Candidate Robert Corbin's prognosis was far bleaker. "Not good, not good," he said outside the Sophia Primary School, where several people were unable to find their names on the list. Corbin and his aides were checking the list electronically to help the voters find their correct polling places. "I need every palm tree I can get," he exclaimed as more people thronged him for help. Later, the elections commission deployed a mobile information unit to the area to assist electors who were unable to find their designated stations.

There were several polling day measures that were put in place to give parties the assurance that there could be no occurrence of any multiple voting or other electoral fraud.

There were paid party agents as well as the use of photographs of voters on folios that were in the possession of presiding officers at stations. Doubts were however raised over the indelible ink that was used to stain voter's fingerprints after several persons managed to remove it. Accountant Christopher Ram like several other persons explained that he used regular bleach to get the stain off his finger which exhibited no trace of the ink. A veteran educator as well as a senior journalist also achieved similar results.

Dr Surujbally said later he did not believe the occurrence to be widespread. He added that overall the commission had received no reports of any breaches although there were a few irregularities at specific stations. On two occasions - at Eccles and at Wauna - the commission removed two presiding officers who deviated from the standard procedure. At Eccles, the officer allowed about 20 persons who were not registered at the polling station and who were not in possession of IDs to vote with ordinary ballots. Boodoo said the officer was removed from official duty and corrective action taken immediately. He said the incident was being investigated. At Wauna, the presiding officer issued tendered ballots instead of ordinary ballots to some electors. According to the law, tendered ballots are not to be counted. There was another irregularity at two other polling stations - the Sophia Primary and the West Demerara Secondary School - where stickers belonging to the governing PPP/C were found on the ballot boxes. These were removed as soon as they were discovered, although the occurrence it did cause some discomfort among voters at the stations. Dr Surujbally said the incidents were both upsetting and mind boggling since they occurred under the watch of presiding officers, their deputies as well as polling clerks and the party agents on hand.

By mid-morning the sorting of the non-resident elector's ballots was done at the commission under the observation of political parties and some local observers. There were 58 envelopes with ballots that were sorted for polling districts #4 (52), #5(4) and #10 (2). All envelopes with the cast ballots were sealed and dispatched to the polling districts for casting at polling stations that were supposed to have been identified. The envelopes with the disciplined forces ballots were also dispatched to the respective returning officer for transmission to the polling station identified for them to be cast before the close of poll.

GECOM has made arrangements for the transmission of a results display screen to all TV stations in Greater Georgetown. The results display screen would carry the periodic announcements and statements that will be made by the commission. Stabroek News August 29th. 2006


The parties speak on crime, unemployment and education

People's National Congress Reform-One Guyana (PNCR-1G) : Education and human development - Stabroek News August 27th. 2006
The Alliance For Change - the troika of economic retardation - Stabroek News August 27th. 2006
GAP-ROAR's policies on crime, unemployment and education - Stabroek News August 20th. 2006
The United Force) The right leadership - ready to lead Guyana - Stabroek News August 20th. 2006
Justice For All Party Crime, unemployment and the economy - Stabroek News August 20th. 2006


Parties wrap up campaign -- PPP/C leads in closing rallies

PRESIDENT Bharrat Jagdeo, plugging unity and equitable distribution of wealth in a US$500B development plan for the next five years, fuelled enthusiasm last evening among mainly sugar workers and rice farmers at Stewartville, West Coast Demerara to pull off the most massive of rallies closing off campaigning for tomorrow’s general and regional elections.

At the 1763 Monument Square in Georgetown, the main opposition People’s National Congress Reform–One Guyana (PNCR-1G) rallied thousands, but fell way behind the governing People’s Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/C).

Though the rally was scheduled to start at 18:30 h, PNCR-1G’s presidential candidate Mr. Robert Corbin, the 58-year-old attorney who is leading his party into the elections for the first time, was a no-show at 21:30 h.

The Alliance for Change, which has emerged as the third main player in the elections, suffered a humiliating last lap, with a small number of supporters at Parade Ground, in Georgetown, where its campaign had an embarrassing start when the stage collapsed with all its leaders on top.


MASS TURNOUT: a section of the huge crowd of supporters at the PPP/C final campaign rally. (Quacy Sampson photo)

PPP/C

Mr. Jagdeo, 42, a Moscow-educated economist, hammered home his party’s accomplishment of moving debt repayment from 94 per cent of revenue in 1992 to 12 per cent today, saying that for this reason, if nothing else, his party deserves victory again.

He is leading his party into the elections without, for the first time in the party’s 56-year history, Mrs. Janet Jagan, the widow of party founder late President Dr. Cheddi Jagan. UPBEAT: PPP/C presidential candidate Bharrat Jagdeo at yesterday’s mass rally at Stewartville. (Quacy Sampson photo)

Mrs. Jagan is not a candidate for the PPP/C for the first time, but Mr. Jagdeo vowed to supporters to fulfil the dream of the late Dr. Jagan.

The party’s supporters, from elderly men and women, to young mothers clinging babies in hands, engaged in sobering celebration of Bob Marley’s “Don’t worry about a thing.” They remembered these were among the last words the late President uttered to his wife.

Mr. Jagdeo is the longest serving head-of-state for the PPP/C which came to power 14 years ago, after surviving 28 years in opposition. Mr. Jagdeo became President in 1999 when Mrs. Jagan resigned due to health reasons, and this is the last time he can face the electorate, having already done so at the March 2001 polls.

The PPP/C Stewartville rally was among the biggest it has held in the month of campaigning for the polls. It was the first such rally in Region Three (Essequibo Islands/West Demerara), where hundreds of families depend on the sugar estates at Wales, West Bank Demerara and Uitvlugt, West Coast Demerara.

Mr. Jagdeo vowed that the PPP/C will not close down the Demerara estates and endanger the livelihoods of those families. His declaration caused supporters to erupt in celebration, whether they were sitting beside the trench, standing, or atop their vehicles.

The decision of the party to take its last rally to Region Three saw widespread support also from rice farmers and the working class, who have benefited from the low income housing schemes set up in the Region, Parfaitte/Harmonie and Tuschen being the largest.

 

The current government has distributed just more than 12, 000 house lots in the region since it came into office and apart from the eight housing schemes that were set up, regional candidate Dr. Moti Singh said 23 squatting areas are being regularised.

He said the crowd support showed that the PPP/C can win Region Three, which has an estimated 67,000 electors.

Mr. Jagdeo urged his supporters to go out and vote early and all the speakers, who included Ms. Bibi Shadick and Ms. Gail Teixeira urged voters to be vigilant and make sure they vote correctly.

PNC/R-1G

The PNCR-1G did not manage to attract the convincing crowd it needed to demonstrate that it can muster the majority and take away power from the PPP/C.

The thousands of supporters who waved the symbolic palm tree and shouted the name of the party’s presidential candidate as it repeated its plan for victory was not any better than that it attracted for its opening rally.

Mr. Corbin failed to show three hours after the scheduled start time.


IN THEIR NUMBERS: a section of the thousands at the PNCR-1G final rally at the
1763 Monument Square in Georgetown last night. (Delano Williams photo)

New candidate Mr. Roy Babel, a reporter who worked at the Evening News, and whose publisher Anthony Viera is also contesting the elections under PNCR-1G, said the party has the persons with the vision to lead the country.

He claimed that the PPP/C has been stifling the country’s development for the past five years and has monopolised certain critical sectors of Guyana such as communication, refusing to allow another television station to operate in Region Ten (Upper Demerara/Berbice).

The PNCR-1G, said if elected, it would provide house lots for all persons between the ages of 18-35 and establish a voluntary National Service for persons to learn life skills.

In addition, the party said it would open five new towns from Rockstone to Lethem. It also promised its supporters economic prosperity and a reduction in crime.

The party’s programme last night included cultural items by Yoruba Singers, Basil Bradshaw and others.

AFC

The AFC’s final rally got off to a late start.

At 18:00 h, when it was intended to start, only a small group of supporters gathered and were seen enjoying the music, as they mingled with each other.

This was far smaller than the sizeable group for its opening rally weeks ago.

Mr Gerhard Ramsaroop, executive member of the AFC, told this newspaper there were about 25-30 cars that came from Plaisance, East Coast Demerara as part of a motorcade.

He said there were many supporters along the way as they drove through the East Coast on the way to Parade Ground.

An hour after the intended time for the start of the programme, Attorney-at-law Nigel Hughes began a speech on the party’s behalf, but leaders Raphael Trotman, Khemraj Ramjattan, and Sheila Holder had not yet turned up.

Ten parties are contesting tomorrow’s elections. Guyana Chronicle August 27th. 2006


Official elections results by Wednesday -- GECOM

THE official declaration of results of the 2006 general and regional elections will be made Wednesday evening, the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM) has advised.

However, Chief Election Officer Gocool Boodhoo will give the first progress report on the counting of the ballots at 23:00 h on polling day.

Mr. Boodhoo, and GECOM chairman Dr. Steve Surujbally and his Commissioners will preside when the official announcement is made at 20:00 h Wednesday, GECOM said in a statement to the media.

According to GECOM, it will deliver scheduled and unscheduled public updates, on a 24-hour basis, on the conduct of the elections, and will give accumulating totals of votes cast for each of the ten political parties contesting the elections.

Voting starts at 06:00 h on Monday and will close 12 hours after. Guyana Chronicle August 27th. 2006


What would happen - In the event of a hung parliament? - In the event of a hung parliament?

Recent polls point to the small possibility of a hung parliament after the elections, which could result in a rare minority government.

The NACTA polls commissioned by Stabroek News up to August 20 projected that the incumbent PPP/C would retain the presidency, but could possibly fall short of an overall majority of seats in the 65-member Parliament, although it was noted that the governing party was gaining momentum. The last commissioned poll found that at that stage the PPP/C (with 47% support) could win around 30 seats, the PNCR-1G 18 (27%), the AFC 10 (16%), GAP-ROAR 2 (2%)), JFAP 2 (4%) and TUF 1 (1%). At the 2001 polls, the PPP/C notched 34 seats, the PNCR 27, GAP/WPA 2, ROAR 1 and the TUF 1. NACTA noted that the AFC could end up holding the balance in the parliament, having found that the two major parties, the PPP/C and the PNCR-1G would lose seats as a result of the emergence of the new party as well as because of the gains made by the JFAP. The first three NACTA polls had a 4% margin of error.

If none of the parties wins an outright majority the result could be a minority government heavily dependent on compromises among the parties to ensure the passage of legislation, including the country's budget.

According to constitutional expert Dr Rupert Roopnaraine, the electoral system allows for the possibility of a hung parliament, though he felt it impossible. He said in such a scenario, the law would still allow for the president to appoint ministers and the cabinet, though the government would be unable to arbitrarily push through legislation - a major criticism of the incumbent. Roopnaraine explained that the situation would warrant constant negotiation for the passage of legislation and especially the approval of the budget estimates. On the latter point, he noted that if the minority government were to fail to get the support of the other parties it would be unable to access the Consolidated Fund.

The first test of such a situation would be the election of the Speaker of the National Assembly. Article 56 (1) of the constitution says when the National Assembly first meets and before it proceeds to any other business, it shall elect a person to be the Speaker. According to the Standing Orders, the election of the Speaker is determined by the agreement of a majority after a willing candidate is proposed and seconded by a member. The Standing Orders do not provide for a debate on the proposals for the post, only allowing for members to call for a division on the proposals.

What is more, a hung parliament could also see the head of state and the government being forced out of office on a majority vote by members of the house. Article 106 of the constitution says the cabinet, including the president shall resign if the government is defeated by the vote of a majority of all the elected members of the National Assembly on a vote of no confidence. Further, it says notwithstanding its defeat the government shall remain in office and shall hold an election within three months, or a longer period determined by a vote of two-thirds of the assembly. The government would then resign after the president takes the oath of office following the elections.

Another possibility of a hung parliament would also see smaller parties shaping the parliamentary agenda. Here, GAP-ROAR, the TUF and the JFAP could make a difference. TUF leader Manzoor Nadir, who served in the PPP/C government as Minister of Tourism for the last five years, is certainly not lost to the importance of the small parties. "…Whoever is the president would have to make alliances in the National Assembly in order to pass laws. TUF could make a big difference," he told Stabroek News recently.

President Bharrat Jagdeo said on Friday that the PPP/C would be willing to work with all in an enhanced framework for cooperation, but he stressed that there would be no coalition or power-sharing. He predicted a majority win for the party and said the opposition could come on board once they subscribed to the PPP/C government's policies and programmes in a similar manner to Nadir. "We could always have disagreements about the best way to achieving them," he said. Stabroek News August 27th. 2006


Poll predicts landslide victory for Jagdeo -- says PPP/C likely to get majority in Parliament

THE New York-based NACTA group, which has accurately forecast previous elections results here and in the Caribbean, is predicting a landslide victory for the incumbent President Bharrat Jagdeo at Monday’s elections.

In a press release yesterday, it said its latest tracking poll shows Mr. Jagdeo “coasting to a landslide victory over his five opponents, leading his nearest rival by 21%.”

“The overwhelming majority of voters rate Jagdeo as the best among the six candidates vying for the presidency, saying the others are not viable alternatives to lead the country at this time”, NACTA said.

“Voters also show a strong likeness for Raphael Trotman of the AFC with two-thirds of the respondents saying they would prefer him to be Opposition Leader over Robert Corbin of the PNCR-1G. They describe Trotman as a decent politician with a promising future”, the release said.

NACTA said voters are also hoping that Mr. Jagdeo would “clean up” his administration by removing tainted ministers and other corrupt officials should he be re-elected.

The release said the poll, which was concluded Thursday, shows the PPP/C sweeping the rural areas and with the momentum on the side of the PPP/C, the party could increase its share of the popular votes.

“The PNCR is also doing well among its rural base. One should keep in mind that a poll is a portrait of voter preference at a particular moment and could change by elections day especially that the political situation is fluid. The actual outcome of the elections would depend on voter turnout”, NACTA noted.

NACTA is a New York-based group with no affiliation with any political party. It has been conducting polls in the Caribbean and elsewhere since 1989.

It said the latest survey was conducted to determine voter support for the parties and the findings are based on interviews systematically conducted over the last week with 746 respondents (344 Indians, 223 Africans, 105 Mixed, 65 Amerindians, and 9 others).

The survey was coordinated by Vishnu Bisram who has extensive experience in conducting research surveys and polls and who has worked on American elections in New York. The poll has a margin of error of 5%.

According to the findings of the survey, the PPP/C has picked up 3% support since Sunday and is in a dead heat with the other parties combined.

NACTA said the PNCR-1G is running second to the PPP/C while the AFC is trailing at a distant third.

But, it said, the AFC could hold the balance of power in Parliament should the PPP/C come up short of a majority of seats.

The other parties, ROAR-GAP, JFA, and TUF are trailing way behind in single digits.

The findings of the survey project the PPP/C with a little over 50% support, PNCR-1G 28%, AFC 15%, and the mini-parties the remainder.

With the margin of error, support for each party could vary up to 5% in either direction meaning, for example, that the PPP/C could garner up to 55% or as low as 45% popular support.

NACTA said the findings show that the PPP/C has lost some support among its traditional base, especially among young “educated” Indians and the business class who are switching their votes to the AFC.

“But the losses suffered by the PPP/C have been offset with gains among Africans and Amerindian voters. The PNCR has also lost significant support since 2001 to the newly formed AFC which is posing a strong challenge to the PNCR to replace it as the official opposition. Two-thirds of the voters say they would prefer the AFC over the PNCR to be the official opposition and half the respondents also indicate they would like to have a balance of power in parliament”, NACTA said.

But while many voters are willing to put their faith in “change”, a larger segment of the population is not willing to break from traditional ethnic voting pattern, it added.

The findings of the NACTA poll show the AFC has made significant inroads into the electorate, drawing support from both the PPP/C and PNCR but more from the latter.

But most of the AFC support, it said, is in the urban areas.

The Justice For All Party has also made gains since 2001 with the poll projecting it getting parliamentary representation as well as winning regional seats.

The other parties have lost ground to the PPP/C and AFC.

According to NACTA, the poll shows that the support that the AFC and JFA have drawn from the PPP/C could potentially deny the PPP/C winning a majority of seats in Monday’s elections. This could result in a balance of power in parliament leading to paralysis in passing bills or forcing cooperation among all the parties.

It said that with regards to the distribution of seats in the new parliament, the PPP/C is projected to win one geographic seat each in Regions 1, 2, 5, 7. It is also projected to get one seat each in Regions 8, 9 where it is leading and another seat is leaning towards the PPP/C in Region 10 where the PNCR is leading.

The PPP/C, it said, is projected to win three seats in Region 4 and two seats each in Region 3 and 6. The poll is projecting the PPP/C as winning in all regions except 10.

Altogether, the PPP/C could wind up to 14 of the 25 geographic seats. This coupled with up to 19 national top up seats could give the PPP/C 33 seats, the minimum required for a majority in parliament.

NACTA said the PNCR is projected to get one seat each in Regions 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 10. It is also expected to win 3 seats in Region 4 to give it a total of 10 geographic seats which when added to 8 top up national seats will give it 18 seats.

The AFC is projected to win one geographic seat in Region 4, it said, adding that no other party is expected to win any geographic seat.

In sum, the PPP/C is projected to win around 33 seats, the PNCR around 18, AFC around 9, and the other parties around 5 seats.

“One should keep in mind that the poll has a margin of error of 5% and there are still undecided voters whose preference would impact on the projected outcome of the poll.

It should also be noted that support has been changing hands among the parties in the last few days of the campaign. Switching of support is particularly pronounced between the AFC and the PNCR and as such either party could make gains at the expense of the other by elections day. Some voters also indicated that they will engage in split ticket as opposed to straight ticket voting. In other words, they will vote for different parties for parliament and regional representations. It would not be surprising, therefore, that a party will get more votes for regional council seats than for national parliamentary seats”, NACTA said. Guyana Chronicle August 26th. 2006


Jagdeo sees no power sharing

President Bharrat Jagdeo yesterday in predicting his party's victory at the polls on Monday said his government would like to work with all the parties in a cooperation framework but sees no power sharing.

At a press conference the PPP/C hosted at Freedom House yesterday, Jagdeo said: "After the elections, we hope we could work with all the parties in a framework, not coalition, not a power-sharing Cabinet, but in an enhanced framework for cooperation."

If the opposition is to come on board, he said, they would have to subscribe to basic PPP/C government policies and programmes aimed at creating more jobs, providing better services, ensuring public safety, building a competitive economy and enhancing the country's image abroad.

"If you can't fit into that like Manzoor Nadir did, when he was offered a position in our cabinet... he had to subscribe to my programme. If you subscribe to those things then we could always have disagreements about the best way to achieving them. But we must settle on those objectives. We are uncompromising on our objectives of poverty reduction and wealth creation."

Meanwhile, independent polls as well as polls conducted by the PPP/C have indicated that the incumbent would win Monday's general elections but Jagdeo would not say by what margin except that "51% is important and anything above that is bonus."

Asked for his prediction on the outcome of the polls, he said that while the PPP/C would win the elections "the PNCR would emerge as the second largest party in Guyana after the PPP/C."

Referring to the AFC polls conducted by American pollster Dick Morris in association with the Mexican polling firm ARCOP, Jagdeo said that he finds it an act of desperation "when you have to publish your own poll as an advertisement."

The AFC, he contended, has been receiving a lot of help from "sympathetic persons including the Stabroek News and I make no bones about it..."

Asked whether the PPP/C would be prepared to work with opposition parties if the party wins the elections without a majority of the votes, Jagdeo responded: "I heard there has been a letter released by Mr (Vishnu) Bisram on an updated poll that Stabroek News is refusing to publish which shows the PPP/C winning a victory." He asked the Stabroek News reporters present whether this was so and whether they knew and advised that they should find out. Stabroek News Editor Anand Persaud last night said the newspaper had told Bisram that it would not be commissioning another tracking poll as it was too close to the elections. He said this decision was transmitted to Bisram before the results of the latest tracking poll were released yesterday. Persaud noted that the results of the last survey were published in Monday's edition and the newspaper believed that there should be no further publication of results in the week preceding the election.

Asked whether he would invite the opposition to assist in the country's development programme, Jagdeo said: "I am not asking for assistance, I am giving them a chance to contribute. I think we are capable alone of delivering the programme but it is always better when all the people of the country work together"

He said that in a new government the opposition would still be free to decide on those things they would want to subscribe to or not. "We would have to move aside from the old political culture of Guyana," that is opposing for opposing sake. He said that by implementing the outstanding constitutional reforms there would be enhanced collaboration be-tween the political parties because there would be more forums for discussions, debates and working things out.

And regarding the contentious advertisement 'The Great Pretender' Jagdeo announced that last night would be its last airing. He found it "very strange that the (referees panel of the) Media Monitoring Unit would try to influence the campaign. We are not fabricating these images," he said. "I said to our guys that we don't need that ad to win the elections so from tonight (last night) we are going to pull it. The booking is done until tonight and we are going to take it off the air. They can't hide from their track records."

While speaking about AFC presidential candidate Raphael Trotman being an unsuitable candidate because of his past association with the PNCR and linking him to past post-elections violence, Jagdeo said, "That's why 'The Great Pretender' is creating so much controversy."

On whether a PPP/C government would consider a truth and reconciliation commission after the elections because of allegations and the casting of blame on each other mainly by the PNCR and the PPP/C, Jagdeo responded in the negative.

He said: "No. In 1992, maybe we should have done that. Because we had 28 years of PNC rule through rigged elections. That is an established fact... No one disputes that." He said there were ten years of unaudited accounts to allow for personal enrichment and misuse of funds to sustain the PNC, no free press for a long time, but he maintained all of that has changed since. "A truth and reconciliation commission is 13 years late," he said.

Asked to comment on allegations of Guyana's economy being propped up by spin-offs of the narcotics trade given the fact that Guyana is a major drugs transshipment point, Jagdeo said that production has increased and per capita GDP has gone from under US$300 when the PPP/C took office to US$900.

He said that there has been nominal growth with aggregate deposits and national disposable income. The growth in aggregate deposits could be correlated with disposable income and could be accounted for, he said.

Referring to a number of public and private sector services being provided, he was doubtful that all the drivers of the economy came from drug proceeds.

However, he added, "there may be a few buildings and a few who are alleged to be drug traffickers and have extravagant lifestyles. But how much is that?

There is no one who has quantified it. I feel it is negligible given what I have said because I have traced the growth of aggregate savings to the growth in national disposable income and to growth in the economy... I don't deny there is some money laundering. That is why we have set up the financial intelligence unit," he contended.
Stabroek News August 26th. 2006


About 150 international observers on polling day

There will be at least 154 international observers on hand when voters go to the polls on Monday.

According to the list of international observers published yesterday by the Guyana Elections Commis-sion (GECOM), the Organisation of American States (OAS) will field the largest contingent with a 124-member mission headed by OAS Assistant Secretary General Albert Ramdin. It will be the most extensive observer team the OAS has fielded in Guyana.

There will also be an 18-member Commonwealth mission, which is headed by Ratu Epeli Nailatikau, a 10-member CARICOM mission headed by Hensley Robinson, and a special two-member European Union (EU) assessment team.

GECOM has established around 2,000 polling stations throughout the country for the elections.

Stabroek News has been told that the OAS team will attempt to cover polling stations in all ten regions.

OAS Secretary General Jose Miguel Insulza said in a statement yesterday that the electoral process is being closely monitored and he expressed satisfaction with the steps taken to ensure transparent elections on Monday. Insulza said the decision to designate Ambassador Ramdin as the chief of the OAS mission indicated the high level of interest of the member states. "These elections represent a critical step in the country's political and democratic development and we believe the OAS can play an important role as an impartial observer," he explained. "Ambassador Ramdin has made several visits to Guyana in recent months and has been in permanent contact with the country's political leaders, electoral authorities and others involved in the process," he added. Insulza described the observer mission as the most extensive it has fielded in Guyana.

The OAS mission comprises three quarters of the international observers. Half of the mission will be made up of trained volunteers from locally-based diplomatic missions, including the US Embassy, USAID, IDB, DFID, the British High Commission, the Canadian High Commission and the European Union. The other members of the team have been arriving this week from various countries in the hemisphere.

Ambassador Ramdin arrived in Guyana on Tuesday and has met with representatives of the other missions as well as domestic observer groups. Today and tomorrow he will participate in training sessions for international and national observers. He has also had discussions with the authorities responsible for election planning and security, including officials from the Guyana Elections Commis-sion (GECOM), Minister of Home Affairs Gail Teixeira, Acting Police Commissioner Henry Greene and head of the army Brigadier General Edward Collins. Stabroek News August 25th.2006


Army on the streets on elections day

UNLIKE previous elections, the Army will Monday be patrolling the streets, performing civilian law enforcement duties as the government seeks to ensure peace during polling day and after, Cabinet Secretary Dr. Roger Luncheon said yesterday.

Luncheon said in the past, the Army would usually be on standby and called out on the streets to help the Police quell disturbances.

But this year they will be on the road to serve.

Police Commissioner (ag) Mr. Henry Greene Monday told Georgetown businessmen that he could not comment on the Army’s role in the security planning for the elections.

Greene said the Guyana Police Force goes on full strength this week in preparation for elections day which will see a continuous Police presence at all polling stations and riot squads on standby in all divisions to deal with any disturbance.

The elections of 1992, 1997 and 2001 have been characterised by instability brought on by violent street protests. Guyana Chronicle August 23rd.


Elections to proceed -as CJ declines jurisdiction in two cases brought by PNCR executives

Chief Justice Carl Singh has declined jurisdiction in two lawsuits that sought to challenge the holding of general elections. He ruled yesterday that the law requires that such cases be presented in a petition after the elections.

The Chief Justice upheld preliminary submissions by Ralph Ramkarran SC, counsel for the Attorney General that the issues could only be heard and determined by a court exercising jurisdiction under Article 163 of the Constitution, which treats with questions about the lawful conduct of elections. "The result is that I therefore decline jurisdiction to hear these matters," he said in a judgement that was delivered yesterday.

The two cases involved PNCR executive Joseph Hamilton's challenge to the legality of a constitutional amendment that allowed for an extension of the election deadline, and Vincent Alexander's application for a ruling on whether the elections commission had a duty to ensure that all registrants on the voters' list were resident.

Rex McKay, SC, Miles Fitzpatrick, SC, and Basil Williams appeared for the applicants, while Ramkarran and others appeared for Attorney General Doodnauth Singh in both matters. Williams said last evening that his legal team is contemplating an appeal.

The Chief Justice, in his ruling, noted that Ramkarran's main submission was that the court should decline jurisdiction to hear the cases since the cases relate to the legality and validity of next week's elections and as such could only be heard and determined by a court exercising and special and exclusive jurisdiction under Article 163 of the Constitution. Ramkarran's submission's related to both cases.

Article 163 provides that the High Court shall have exclusive jurisdiction to determine any question "whether generally or in any particular place, an election has been lawfully conducted or the result thereof has been, or may have been affected by an unlawful act or omission." Further, it says, "Parliament may make provisions with respect to the circumstances and manner in which and the conditions upon which proceedings for the determination of any question under this Article may be instituted in the High Court and an appeal may be brought to the Court of Appeal in respect thereof." In furtherance of this provision, the National Assembly (Validity of Elections) Act Chapter 1:04 provides that any question in respect of an election referred to in the Article and with a view to securing appropriate orders, be referred to the Court and shall thereupon be determined by it. Also, it says every such reference shall be by an election petition presented in accordance with the Act.

However, in response to Ramkarran's submissions, McKay and Fitzpatrick noted that the issue was not whether the election was validly conducted, rather, whether a purported alteration of the Constitution was valid. They said the question was embedded in the Constitution itself and in the constitutional responsibility of the court. They added that the issue precedes and overrides the limited exclusiveness of Article 163, and placed emphasis on the constitutionality of the Article 61 amendment.

However, Chief Justice Singh referred to the precedent set in two previous cases - Gladys Petrie and Others v The Attorney General (1968) and Seecomar Singh and Another v R.C. Butler (1973) - where former Chief Justice Sir Harold Bollers found that questions, including constitutional questions, touching the issue of whether an election has been lawfully conducted, falls within the limited and exclusive jurisdiction of the High Court as provided for by the Constitution and that such issues should be brought by way of an election petition.

The Chief Justice noted that in the case brought by Hamilton, his lawyers argued that they were not asking the court to interpret the constitution. Rather, they contended that they sought to find that a purported alteration of the constitution was invalid. The Chief Justice said he found this claim perplexing, given that Hamilton's claim sought a declaration that the Article 61 amendment was unconstitutional, illegal, null and void. "Such a declaration, I daresay, cannot be made, without an interpretation of the challenged Act and under relevant provisions of the Constitution." Moreover, he said in both cases it was not only the nature of the laws that were being challenged or the nature of the challenge which determine the factors of the jurisdiction. Instead, he said the remedies and answers being sought and their potential effect on the elections were vital and important factors. "It is obvious to me, as indeed it should be to anyone, that the relief sought by Hamilton and the questions posed by Alexander impact upon the question whether the election has been lawfully conducted. In my view, such a conclusion immediately brings into consideration the provisions of Article 163 of the Constitution," he concluded.

Hamilton's lawyers had also argued that the constitutional amendment was not passed within what the court considers the election period and as a result it could not have implications for questions about whether an election has been lawfully conducted. The Chief Justice disagreed, noting that, in the case of Hamilton, if the challenged law was declared unconstitutional, the legality of the election would be open to challenge. He added that, in the case of Alexander, if some procedure or requirement of the laws was not followed, it would follow that the question of whether the elections were lawfully conducted would be put in issue. Consequently, he said it was not a matter of any moment whether the law or laws was or were passed during the election period. "What would be of primary importance would be the effect of those laws upon the lawful conduct of the elections," he explained.

Singh noted that the lawyers for both sides did address the question of the validity of the Article 61 amendment and the consequences of it being struck down by the court for want of constitutionality, but in light of his findings he saw no need to examine these issues.

Meanwhile, taking judicial notice that that the electoral process had begun with the disciplined services balloting on Monday, he noted a comment by the Supreme Court of India, that advised against a High Court passing any orders, interim or otherwise, which might effect the postponement of an election that is reasonably imminent and over which its jurisdiction is invoked. "The… sentiments speak to a self-imposed limitation by the courts, in relation to election matters which are not without significance and relevance, given the fact, that in these cases, elections are not reasonably imminent but have actually begun," he observed. Stabroek News August 23rd.


NCN cameraman attacked at PNCR-1G meeting -station withdraws coverage

The National Communications Network (NCN) has pulled its coverage of PNCR-1G public meetings after reporting that a supporter of the group attacked a cameraman at an official function yesterday.

NCN announced last evening that all coverage of the coalition's public meetings and rallies has been withdrawn pending an assurance from the group's leadership that adequate protection would be given to both its human and material resources in the wake of the incident. This is the second such incident reported by the Network in the last month.

Stabroek News was unable to get a comment from the PNCR-1G last night.

According to the NCN statement, a cameraman filming a PNCR-1G meeting at Lodge was attacked by a woman. PNCR activist Juliana Gaul had just completed her presentation at the meeting when the attack is said to have occurred. The Network sad an irate woman charged the cameraman, shouting, 'we ain't want Channel 11 hey, we ain't want y'all.' It further said the shocked cameraman was then pounced upon by the woman, who allegedly scrambled a video camera, distorting the video image that was being captured at the time. Gaul intervened and prevented the woman from causing further damage to both the equipment and personnel, the statement added.

NCN said most of episode had been captured on video and would be supplied to the police force, the Advisory Committee on Broadcasting, the various observer groups, the elections commission's Media Monitoring Unit and the Independent Media Refereeing Panel.

NCN also recalled the previous attack at Linden, where a bottle was hurled at one of its reporters. The party subsequently said that an investigation revealed it was the driver of the NCN vehicle that provoked the attack - a response that the Network described as an "inadequate excuse" and an "an absolute lie." The company noted that such behaviour by party supporters lends little or nothing to the confidence of journalists when covering political events. Stabroek News


Polling to close 6 pm sharp -Surujbally

Guyana Elections Commis-sion Chairman Dr Steve Surujbally has said the close of poll on August 28 would not be extended beyond the 6 pm deadline.

"We have seen from bitter experience of the past that to allow such a possibility is to allow chaos and havoc," he told reporters at a news conference yesterday, where he gave an update on electoral preparations for the August 28 elections. He, however, explained that if persons are waiting in a queue to vote at closing time, the station would remain open to enable them to vote. The usual practice is that the presiding officer at the station would take the last name of the person in the line at the close of poll and a police officer would stand behind the voters to ensure that no other person is allowed to vote. Dr Surujbally said that the deadline would be maintained even in the event that the station opens late ad he refused to speculate on whether unforeseen circumstances could force an extended opening.

At the 2001 elections, many poll stations remained open beyond the official deadline, the result, in part, of a heavy voter turnout at the last minute as well as the incorrect placement of some electors.

The late closing of polls at the last elections was partially responsible for the delay in the availability of collated results, which were not issued until four days after. Dr Surujbally has so far stressed that the commission would try to ensure that results are available as early as possible but he is yet to commit to any specific timelines. He disclosed yesterday that the commission had received a methodology though he could not give details.

Dr Surujbally urged that electors take the necessary steps before election day to ensure that they know where they are to cast their votes. He noted that there will be almost 2,000 polling stations throughout the country. The 2006 official list of polling places is available on the commission's website, http://www.gecom.org.gy. Voters could also call the commission's hotline numbers, which are in the press. He added that political parties also have a vested interest in informing voters where they have to go to vote.

At the start of the press conference yesterday, Dr Surujbally joined in the condemnation of last Tuesday's attack on Kaieteur News, which resulted in the death of five people. He was of the view that the attack was orchestrated to sow fear among the citizenry and create disruption and disorder. He said it was not coincidental that it took place three weeks before the elections. In this vein, he called on voters to deny the attackers the satisfaction. "Turn out in large numbers of election day…" he said, adding, "do